Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Refractory to Biologic Therapies: 2-Year Results from the Phase 3 Select-Psa 2 Study

Background/Aims Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and prior inadequate response or intolerance to >=1 biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) at week (wk) 56 in the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UPA at wk 104 from the ongoing long-term extension of SELECTPsA 2. Methods Pts were randomized to UPA 15mg (UPA15), UPA 30mg (UPA30), or placebo (PBO) for 24 wks;PBO pts were then switched to UPA15 or UPA30. For continuous UPA treatment groups, efficacy endpoints at wk 104 were analyzed using non-responder imputation (NRI) and as observed (AO) (binary endpoints) or mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) and AO (continuous endpoints). Treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized for pts who received >=1 dose of study drug using visit-based cut-off at wk 104. Results A total of 641 pts received >=1 dose of study drug. At wk 104, 38.4% of all patients had discontinued study drug, with the highest discontinuation observed in patients randomized to PBO at baseline (all PBO: 46.7%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (UPA15: 12.3%, UPA30: 8.7%, all PBO: 21.7%) and adverse event (UPA15: 10.9%, UPA30: 13.3%, all PBO: 12.7%). The proportion of UPA pts that achieved ACR20/50/70, MDA, PASI75/90/100, and resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis were generally similar, or further improved, with 104 wks of treatment vs 56 wks. Similarly, mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI, patient's assessment of pain, BASDAI, and ASDAS was improved with UPA treatment. At 104 wks of therapy, clinical responses were largely similar with UPA15 and UPA30. Generally, safety data at wk 104 were consistent with that reported at wk 56. Rates of serious infection, herpes zoster, hepatic disorder, anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and CPK elevation remained numerically higher with UPA30 vs UPA15, while rates of malignancies, MACE, and VTE were similar for both UPA groups. One death was reported with UPA15 (unexplained due to lack of information;however, the patient had recently been diagnosed with ovarian cancer) and two with UPA30 (pancytopenia and COVID-19 pneumonia). Conclusion In PsA pts with prior inadequate response or intolerance to>=1 bDMARD, clinical responses were maintained with UPA15 and UPA30 up to two years of treatment. No new safety signals were identified in this long-term extension.

Real-World Single-Centre Experience of Jak Inhibitor Use in Ra

Background/Aims The use of Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAKi) has been gradually increasing overtime in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory arthritis and these appeal to patients. being oral agents. Nevertheless, rheumatologists have become cautious about their use since recent trials have shown safety concerns about VTEs, MACE and malignancies. Methods We decided to study use of JAKi at our centre in Princess of Wales Hospital Bridgend. The aim was to assess whether appropriate patients were selected (considering cautions about MACE, VTEs and malignancies). We also wanted to see whether all patients had required pretreatment safety testing and post-treatment monitoring performed. Results These were 70 patients;59 were females and 11 were males. All of them were diagnosed as RA. Average age was 61.1 years (20-85), average duration of disease 129.9 months (16-340) and average duration of treatment was 58.1 weeks. The most common JAKi being used was baricitinib (84%) followed by tofacitinib (12%) and upadacitinib (4%). 50% patient were on concomitant csDMARDs among whom two-thirds were on methotrexate. Looking at previous biologic use, 9 patients were biologic naive, 22 had one biologic, 15 had two biologics used in the past. All patients were appropriately selected (severe RA and no significant risk factors for MACE, VTEs and malignancies). All patients had pre-treatment Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, latent TB, FBC and LFTs checked. All patients had FBC and LFTs monitored post treatment. No patient developed VTE, MACE or cancer on treatment. 84.2% patients had lipids tested before starting JAKi. 22.8% patients had abnormal lipids before Rx initiation and 62.5% of these were on lipid lowering Rx. All patients had lipids tested post treatment, but the timing was quite variable and only 62.5% of patients had lipids tested on the recommended time. There were 2 deaths recorded in this cohort. One of those was an 80-year-old RA patient on baricitinib 2mg OD, who died due to chest infection on the background of ILD. He was not on steroids or csDMARDs. The second patient was 63 years' old (on baricitinib 4mg OD), and died due to respiratory sepsis, and was also on azathioprine. She had RA with advanced ILD. The reasons for discontinuing JAKi were inefficacy (46%), side effects (39%) and both inefficacy and side effects (15%). 41.4%of patient experienced side effects due to JAKi. These included infection 28%, deranged lipids 17%, cytopenia 14%, deranged LFTs 14%, GI side effects 10%, skin rash 7% and varicella zoster 3%. Conclusion There has been steady increase in the use of tsDMARDs for RA and other rheumatic conditions. Due to short half-life, these drugs became a popular choice during COVID-19 pandemic but on the other hand safety monitoring became extremely challenging during this time.

Use of Upadacitinib in 11 Tofacitinib-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Patients at a Single Tertiary Care Center

INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. Upadacitinib is an oral, selective, small molecule Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor that was recently approved in the United States for moderate to severe UC. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of upadacitinib excluded patients with a previous exposure to tofacitinib, a nonselective JAK inhibitor;therefore, the efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with previous exposure to tofacitinib remains largely unknown. METHOD(S): We present a small retrospective case series of all patients with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis seen at our institution between with a prior exposure to tofacitinib who were initiated on upadacitinib between May and August of 2022. Demographic data was collected as well as outcome data on clinical improvement, steroid-free remission, biochemical improvement, colectomy status, and adverse events. RESULT(S): Eleven tofacitinib-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis were initiated on upadacitinib. Mean age was 38.1 years, five (45.5%) patients were female, nine (81.8%) patients were white, seven (63.6%) patients had pancolitis, and mean duration of UC was 7.4 years (Table 1). In this group, there were high rates of prior targeted therapy failures. These patients were followed for a mean of 121 days. The clinical course of each patient is presented in Table 2. Of the 11 patients included in our study, nine (81.8%) patients reported symptomatic improvement, six (54.5%) patients were able to successfully taper corticosteroids, and two (18.2%) patients underwent colectomy, one of which was elective and planned prior to initiating upadacitinib. The mean fecal calprotectin improvement was 1430mg/kg of patients with both baseline and follow-up testing. Three (27.3%) patients experienced an adverse event;two (18.2%) patients with mild COVID-19 not requiring hospitalization and one (9.1%) patient with Enteropathogenic E. Coli. DISCUSSION: This real-world single-center case series of 11 patients, suggests that upadacitinib may be an effective option for patients with a previous tofacitinib exposure. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023

Pharm Aco Kin Etics, Safety, and Tolerability of Upadacitinib in Children with Atopic Dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Upadacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of adults and adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of upadacitinib in children with severe atopic dermatitis. METHOD(S): This is an open-label, multiple-dose study. AD patients (n = 35) were enrolled into four cohorts (Cohort 1, 6 to <12 years, low dose;Cohort 2, 6 to <12 years, high dose;Cohort 3, 2 to <6 years, low dose;Cohort 4, 2 to <6 years, high dose). The low and high doses were selected based on body weight to provide comparable plasma exposure in pediatrics to 15 mg and 30 mg QD doses in adults, respectively. All patients continued on the low dose after the PK assessment on Study Day 7. Safety and exploratory efficacy parameters are assessed in the study. RESULT(S): Geometric mean Cmax and AUC over 0-24 hours at steady state were 33.1 ng/mL and 249 ng.h/mL, respectively, in Cohort 1, 95.5 ng/mL and 523 ng.h/mL, respectively, in Cohort 2, 35.2 ng/mL and 264 ng.h/mL, respectively, in Cohort 3, and 101 ng/mL and 625 ng.h/mL, respectively, in Cohort 4. Upadacitinib was generally safe and well tolerated. The most common AEs were COVID infection, headache, and abdominal discomfort. No new safety risks were identified compared to the known safety profile for upadacitinib. In the 29 subjects with available interim efficacy results at week 12, 34.5% achieved validated Investigator's Global Assessment scale for AD score of 0 or 1 and 69.0% achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index by at least 75% at Week 12 with treatment of upadacitinib. CONCLUSION(S): The findings supported the use of current dosing regimens for further investigation of upadacitinib in upcoming phase 3 clinical trials in pediatric AD patients.

Use of Upadacitinib in 11 Tofacitinib-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Patients at a Single Tertiary Care Center

INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. Upadacitinib is an oral, selective, small molecule Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor that was recently approved in the United States for moderate to severe UC. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of upadacitinib excluded patients with a previous exposure to tofacitinib, a nonselective JAK inhibitor;therefore, the efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with previous exposure to tofacitinib remains largely unknown. METHOD(S): We present a small retrospective case series of all patients with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis seen at our institution between with a prior exposure to tofacitinib who were initiated on upadacitinib between May and August of 2022. Demographic data was collected as well as outcome data on clinical improvement, steroid-free remission, biochemical improvement, colectomy status, and adverse events. RESULT(S): Eleven tofacitinib-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis were initiated on upadacitinib. Mean age was 38.1 years, five (45.5%) patients were female, nine (81.8%) patients were white, seven (63.6%) patients had pancolitis, and mean duration of UC was 7.4 years (Table 1). In this group, there were high rates of prior targeted therapy failures. These patients were followed for a mean of 121 days. The clinical course of each patient is presented in Table 2. Of the 11 patients included in our study, nine (81.8%) patients reported symptomatic improvement, six (54.5%) patients were able to successfully taper corticosteroids, and two (18.2%) patients underwent colectomy, one of which was elective and planned prior to initiating upadacitinib. The mean fecal calprotectin improvement was 1430mg/kg of patients with both baseline and follow-up testing. Three (27.3%) patients experienced an adverse event;two (18.2%) patients with mild COVID-19 not requiring hospitalization and one (9.1%) patient with Enteropathogenic E. Coli. DISCUSSION: This real-world single-center case series of 11 patients, suggests that upadacitinib may be an effective option for patients with a previous tofacitinib exposure. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. (Table Presented).

Effect of upadacitinib on inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease in the phase 3, U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED, and U-ENDURE studies

Background: Improvement in clinical outcomes and normalisation of objective markers of inflammation, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP), are considered treatment targets per STRIDE-II guidelines.1 We evaluated the effect of the oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) on changes in hs-CRP, FCP, and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Method(s): In 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction studies (U-EXCEL, NCT03345849;U-EXCEED, NCT03345836), patients with moderate-to-severe CD received 12-week treatment with UPA 45 mg (UPA45) once daily (QD) or placebo (PBO). Patients with clinical response to UPA45 were rerandomised in U-ENDURE (NCT03345823) to receive 52-week maintenance treatment with UPA 30 mg QD (UPA30), UPA 15 mg QD (UPA15), or PBO. Endpoints included marker normalisation (hs-CRP <= 5 mg/L, FCP <= 250 mug/g) in patients with elevated baseline marker levels, normal marker and clinical remission by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI < 150) or very soft/liquid stool frequency (SF)/abdominal pain score (APS) (average daily SF <= 2.8 and average daily APS <= 1, neither greater than baseline), and >= 50% reduction from baseline in marker values with a decrease of at least 100 points in CDAI from baseline. Median changes from baseline in marker levels were also evaluated. Non-responder imputation with no special data handling for missing data due to COVID-19 was used. Result(s): Of 1021 enrolled patients, 645 (63.2%) had elevated hs-CRP (> 5 mg/L) and 750 (73.5%) had elevated FCP (> 250 mug/g) levels at baseline. Significantly greater proportions of patients with elevated baseline marker levels achieved normalisation with UPA compared with PBO at week 12 (Fig 1A/B) and week 52 (Fig 2A/B;nominal P < .001 for all). Decreases in marker levels from baseline with UPA were observed as early as week 2 and were significantly greater than with PBO through week 12 (Fig 1C) and week 52 (Fig 2C;nominal P < .001 for all). Patients achieved clinical endpoints and improvements in markers at significantly higher rates with UPA45 vs PBO at week 12 (Fig 1D-F) and with UPA15 and UPA30 vs PBO at week 52 (Fig 2D-F;P < .001 for all). The safety profile of UPA in CD was previously reported and no new safety concerns were identified. Conclusion(s): Improvements in clinical endpoints and normalisation of objective markers of inflammation were achieved as early as week 2 with UPA45 induction and sustained with UPA15 and UPA30 maintenance therapy in patients with CD. Median changes in hs-CRP and FCP with UPA support continued improvement of inflammation up to week 52 .

A case of de novo seronegative inflammatory oligoarthritis associated with COVID-19 infection

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus is characterized by an acute respiratory viral illness, often accompanied by extrapulmonary manifestations. Musculoskeletal symptoms such as myalgias and arthralgias are observed in 60 - 70% of cases. Inflammatory arthritis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported in the literature, however, nearly all such cases describe a post-viral or reactive phenomenon occurring a few weeks following the infection. We report a unique case of de novo arthritis at the onset of a confirmed COVID-19 infection in a 55-year-old woman. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated synovial enhancement consistent with synovitis. Her disease was deemed refractory after failing several immunosuppressive agents. Lastly, we compare our patient's clinical presentation with two other similar cases to understand the natural history of this emerging syndrome.Copyright © 2022

Upadacitinib treatment in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: A retrospective single-centre Australian review of 14 patients post phase 3 clinical trial.

Recent phase 2b and phase 3 clinical trials support the safety and efficacy of the selective Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). However, to date, there is little experience with UPA therapy for AD in Australia. We report findings from a retrospective study to better understand the therapeutic response and side effects noted in a single-centre Australian cohort.

Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Single-Center 16-Week Study.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD) includes cyclosporine and recently approved biologics and small molecules. Among these, upadacitinib is a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1, approved for the treatment of severe AD in adolescents/adults. Upadacitinib has shown efficacy and safety in several phase 3 clinical trials, but data on real-life patients are still lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective real-life observational study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib up to week 16 in a cohort of both bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients. This study was carried out by analyzing the AD database records of an Italian referral hospital. Thirty-eight patients were included in this study, and 35 completed 16 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: At week 16, out of 35 patients, the percentages of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 50, EASI 75, EASI 90 and EASI 100 responses were 94.29, 91.43, 74.29, and 60%, respectively. A decrease of at least 4 points from baseline of itch-NRS was reported by 94.74 and 91.43% of patients at weeks 8 and 16. Regarding the safety of upadacitinib, 26.32% of patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE), and a total of 13 AEs were recorded, including blood test abnormalities and papulopustular acne. None of our patients interrupted the drug because of an AE. CONCLUSIONS: We observed higher rates of EASI75/EASI90/EASI100 responses at week 16, compared with data from clinical trials. The safety profile of upadacitinib was favorable, as no AEs leading to discontinuation were experienced by our patients up to week 16.

Telemedicine for follow-up of lupus nephritis in the Covid-19 outbreak: A randomised controlled trial

Background: Blockade of JAK, preferably JAK1, by upadacitinib is a feasible approach to achieve erosion repair as it (1) is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), (2) effectively controls the inflammation and (3) targets pathogenic pathways that influence local bone homeostasis in the joint. To address the question whether inhibition of JAK1 could lead to erosion repair in patients with active RA, we performed a pilot non-randomized study comparing the changes in bone erosions on high-resolution peripheral quantitative computer tomography (HR-pQCT) before and after upadacitinib. Method(s): This is a 24-week, single-centered, prospective, non-randomized pilot study. We enrolled 20 adult patients with active RA (Disease activity score 28-C- reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] > 3.2) and >=1 bone erosion on HR-pQCT. They were given upadacitinib 15mg once daily for 6 months. HR-pQCT of the 2-4 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) head was done at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcome was the change of erosion volume on HR-pQCT. Secondary outcomes included change in RA disease activity and predictors of response to treatment. Erosion regression was defined as decrease in volume exceeding the smallest detectable change. Result(s): The baseline clinical characteristics of the recruited patients were shown in Table 1. Of the 20 patients, 11 (55%) patients failed to respond to 3 or more csDMARDs. At 24-week, there was significant improvement in mean DAS28 (-1.75, P < 0.001). Erosion regression was seen in 8 (40%) patients on HR-pQCT (Figure 1). Although no significant change in overall median erosion volume before and after upadacintinib (0.07 [-0.90 to 0.76 mm3] mm3, P = 0.904) was noted, the deterioration was less obvious compared to a historic cohort of 20 patients with similar age and disease activity on csDMARDs (median erosion volume change in 6 months: 0.67 mm3). When patients were stratified according to whether or not they had failed multiple csDMARDs, significantly high proportion of patients in the non-multiple- DMARDs failure group had volume regression in at least one erosion compared to those in the failure group (75% vs 25%, P = 0.04). There was improvement in mean total erosion volume in the non-failure group (-0.33 +/- 1.33 mm3), whereas mean erosion volume in the failure group worsened (2.09 +/- 7.62 mm3). One patient developed chest infection requiring hospitalization and withdrew from the study. No other serious adverse event was noted. Conclusion(s): The results of the study suggest upadacitinib is clinically efficacious in refractory RA disease and can retard erosion progression. Regression of erosion is possible, particularly in those with limited csDMARDs exposure. Whether early JAK1 inhibition could lead to better structural outcome warrants further investigations. (Figure Presented).

Targeted combined endpoint improvement in patient and disease domains in atopic dermatitis (AD) among adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with upadacitinib

Recommendations for a treat-to-target approach were recently developed to guide systemic therapy for disease control in adults with AD. Recommendations outlined criteria for a 3-month initial acceptable target goal: reduction from baseline ≥1 on a 5-level Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) scale and ≥1 specific disease domain target (≥50% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI-50];≥50% reduction in Scoring of AD [SCORAD-50];and a reduction from baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [WP-NRS] ≥3, Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] ≥4, or Patient Oriented Eczema Measure [POEM] ≥4);and a 6-month optimal target goal: PGIS ≤2 and ≥1 specific disease domain target (EASI-75 or EASI ≤7, SCORAD-75 or SCORAD ≤24, WP-NRS ≤4, DLQI ≤5, POEM ≤7). Achievement of these criteria with once-daily upadacitinib (15 mg and 30 mg) monotherapy was compared with placebo using integrated adult data from MU1 and MU2 trials and nonresponder imputation incorporating multiple imputation for missing values due to COVID-19. Greater proportions of patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg;30 mg vs placebo (P <.001 for all) achieved the initial acceptable target goal at week 2 (78.9%;82.6% vs 25.0%) and week 16 (72.5%;80.2% vs 22.9%), and the optimal target goal at week 2 (52.8%;64.3% vs 6.3%) and week 16 (56.2%;70.1% vs 13.9%). These results suggest that once-daily oral upadacitinib (15 mg and 30 mg) may help improve standards of care in patients with moderate-to-severe AD by achieving 6-month target goals at 16 weeks and as early as 2 weeks for most patients.

SAFETY PROFILE of JAK INHIBITORS in REAL WORLD from A SINGLE CENTER COHORT

Background: Recent published data have emerged some concerns about safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and FDA have established prescribing restrictions. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the safety profile of current approved JAK inhibitors in Europe with data from a Real World cohort. Methods: A single center observational study was performed including patients who had initiated treatment with Tofacitinib, Baricitinib or Upadacitinib from September, 2017 to January, 2022. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and safety variables were collected from baseline and at months 1, 3, 6 and every six months. Safety data was collected including any adverse event (AE) due to any cause. An AE was considered serious if it was life-threatening or result in hospitaliza-tion, disability or in death. All AE and SAE were expressed adjusted by exposure (E/100 PY). Results: A total of 194 patients were included whom baseline demographic and disease characteristics are exposed in Table 1. Drug exposure was 265.5 patient-years. Overall, 214 AE were detected being mild upper tract respiratory infection the most frequently registered (15.82 E/100PY) followed by Urinary tract Infection accounting 7.16 E/100PY. 10 Serious Infections were detected in 10 patients of which 5 were pneumonia (1.88 E/100PY), 1 cellulitis (0.38 E/100PY) and 2 COVID-19 (0.76 E/100PY). 12 herpetic infection were detected in 9 patients (4.52 E/100PY) of which 7 were caused by herpes zoster (2.64 E/100PY) and 5 by herpes simplex (1.88 E/100PY) 3 cases were mono-metameric and 4 multi-metameric. Moreover, 2 patient developed postherpetic neuralgia. A patient with RA developed Miliary Tuberculosis (0.38 E/100PY) with a negative IGRA test prior to the JAKi. A patient with RA suffered a Myocardial Infarction (0.38 E/100PY). 7 RA patients developed malignancy (2.64 E/100PY), one with oral squamous cell carcinoma, two Bowen carcinoma, one breast cancer, 2 basal cell carcinoma and a colorectal metastatic cancer. Not a single case of thromboembolic event nor Hepatitis B Virus reactivation were registered. 2 patients died, one with cancer and the other suffered a severe COVID-19 (unvaccinated). Conclusion: In this updated analysis of 194 patients treated with JAKi, the three approved JAKi showed a safety profile consistent with data from RCT. The patients under JAK therapy should be carefully evaluated on their follow-up.

EFFICACY and SAFETY of UPADACITINIB in PATIENTS with ACTIVE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS REFRACTORY to BIOLOGIC THERAPY: A DOUBLEBLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PHASE 3 TRIAL

Background: Upadacitinib (UPA) was shown to be safe and effective through 2 years in patients (pts) with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) naïve to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in the pivotal phase 2/3 SELECT-AXIS 1 trial.1,2 Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of UPA in pts with active AS with an inadequate response (IR) to bDMARDs. Methods: SELECT-AXIS 2 (NCT04169373) was conducted under a master protocol and includes two separate studies (one for AS bDMARD-IR and one for non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis [nr-axSpA]). The AS bDMARD-IR study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, phase 3 trial that enrolled adults ≥18 years with AS who met modifed New York criteria, had BAS-DAI and pt's assessment of total back pain scores ≥4 (numeric rating scale 0-10) at study entry, and had an IR to one or two bDMARDs (TNF inhibitor or IL-17 inhibitor). Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive oral UPA 15 mg once daily (QD) or PBO during the 14-week (wk) double-blind treatment period. The primary endpoint was ASAS40 response at wk 14. Multiplicity-controlled secondary endpoints evaluated at wk 14 were improvements from baseline in disease activity (ASDAS [CRP], ASDAS ID [<1.3], ASDAS LDA [<2.1], BASDAI50, ASAS20, and ASAS PR), pain (total and nocturnal back pain), function (BASFI), objective measure of infammation (SPARCC MRI score of the spine), spinal mobility (BASMI), enthesitis (MASES), and quality of life (ASQoL and ASAS HI). Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation (NRI-MI) was used to handle intercurrent events and missing data for binary endpoints. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test and mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) were used for analyzing binary and continuous endpoints, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) assessed through wk 14 are reported for pts who had ≥1 dose of study drug. Results: All 420 randomized pts with active AS received assigned treatment (UPA 15 mg, n=211;PBO, n=209);409 (97%) received study drug through wk 14. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups and refective of an active AS bDMARD-IR population (74% male;mean age 42.4 years;mean disease duration 7. 7 years;83% HLA-B27 positive;mean BASDAI 6.8). Signifcantly more pts achieved the primary endpoint of ASAS40 response at wk 14 with UPA vs PBO (45% vs 18%;P<0.0001;Figure 1);UPA showed onset of effect in ASAS40 as early as wk 4 (nominal P≤0.05). All multiplicity-controlled secondary endpoints met statistical signifcance for UPA vs PBO at wk 14 across multiple clinical domains of AS (P<0.0001;Figure 1). The rate of TEAEs was similar between treatment groups through wk 14 (UPA, 41%;PBO, 37%). TEAEs led to discontinuation in 3 (1.4%) pts treated with PBO and none with UPA. Serious infections occurred with UPA (2.4%) but not with PBO and included 4 events of COVID-19 and 1 event of uveitis. Additional events of uveitis were reported in 3 (1.4%) pts treated with PBO. Infammatory bowel disease (IBD) occurred in 1 (0.5%) pt on UPA and none on PBO. No malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolic events, or death were reported with UPA;1 event of malignancy was observed with PBO. Conclusion: UPA 15 mg QD was signifcantly more effective than PBO over 14 wks of treatment in pts with active AS and IR to bDMARDs. No new safety risks were identifed with UPA compared with its known safety profile.3,4 These fndings are consistent with and complementary to those of SELECT-AXIS 1 (bDMARD-naïve AS population),1,2 and support the use of UPA in pts with active AS, including those who had a previous IR to bDMARD therapy.

LONG-TERM EFFICACY and SAFETY of UPADACITINIB in PATIENTS with PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS REFRACTORY to BIOLOGIC THERAPIES: 2-YEAR RESULTS from the PHASE 3 SELECT-PSA 2 STUDY

Background: Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and prior inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 biologic disease-modifying antirheu-matic drug (bDMARD) at week (wk) 56 in the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 study.1 Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of UPA at wk 104 from the ongoing long-term extension of SELECT-PsA 2. Methods: Pts were randomized to UPA 15 mg (UPA15), UPA 30 mg (UPA30), or placebo (PBO) for 24 wks;PBO pts were then switched to UPA15 or UPA30. For continuous UPA treatment groups, efficacy endpoints at wk 104 were analyzed using non-responder imputation (NRI) and as observed (AO) (binary endpoints) or mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) and AO (continuous endpoints). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized for pts who received ≥1 dose of study drug using visit-based cut-off at wk 104. Results: A total of 641 pts received ≥1 dose of study drug. At wk 104, 38.4% of all patients had discontinued study drug, with the highest discontinuation observed in patients randomized to PBO at baseline (all PBO: 46.7%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (UPA15: 12.3%, UPA30: 8.7%, all PBO: 21.7%) and adverse event (UPA15: 10.9%, UPA30: 13.3%, all PBO: 12.7%). The proportion of UPA pts that achieved ACR20/50/70, MDA, PASI75/90/100, and resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis were generally similar, or further improved, with 104 wks of treatment vs 56 wks1 (Table 1). Similarly, mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI, patient's assessment of pain, BASDAI, and ASDAS was improved with UPA treatment. At 104 wks of therapy, clinical responses were largely similar with UPA15 and UPA30. Generally, safety data at wk 104 (Figure 1) were consistent with that reported at wk 56.1 Rates of serious infection, herpes zoster, hepatic disorder, anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and CPK elevation remained numerically higher with UPA30 vs UPA15, while rates of malignancies, MACE, and VTE were similar for both UPA groups. One death was reported with UPA15 (unexplained due to lack of information;however, the patient had recently been diagnosed with ovarian cancer) and 2 with UPA30 (pancytopenia and COVID-19 pneumonia). Conclusion: In PsA pts with prior inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 bDMARD, clinical responses were maintained with UPA15 and UPA30 up to 2 years of treatment. No new safety signals were identifed in this long-term extension.

THE IMPACT of COVID-19 PANDEMIC on DISEASE MONITORING and MONITORING for ADVERSE CLINICAL OUTCOMES in THOSE on BIOLOGIC THERAPY

Background: The coronavirus pandemic, is an ongoing global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.1 The pandemic has posed major challenges to the National Health Service, with implications for patients with rheumatological diseases. 2 In order to try and prevent transmission of the virus, the delivery of patient care has adapted, involving more telephone and virtual review of patients. The British Society of Rheumatology (BSR) has highlighted the importance of adopting a 'treat-to-target' 3 approach in managing these patients to facilitate early treatment escalation in the presence of active disease. Close monitoring of disease is an integral approach to managing these patients. Disruption to previous patterns of care and disease monitoring of biologic patients theoretically may increase the risk of disease fare and adverse clinical outcomes. 4 Objectives: The BSR recommends all patients receiving biologic therapy should be reviewed for drug safety every 6 months. It recommends that patients prescribed a biologic should have monitoring blood tests every 3-6 months.3, 5 The BSR has published mitigating guidance outlined within the COVID-19 rapid guide-line.5 This suggests it's safe to increase time intervals between blood tests for drug monitoring, particularly if 3-monthly blood tests have been stable for over 2 years. Our aims are to evaluate whether altering our delivery of care has impacted on the 'treat-to-target' approach and the frequency of blood monitoring in those on biologic therapy, despite the challenges of an ongoing global pandemic. Methods: Over a period of 1 month a total of 51 patients receiving biologic therapy case notes were reviewed. Data was collected relating to underlying diagnosis, choice of biologic, whether a disease activity score was performed, method of consult and compliance with drug monitoring. Results: Of the 51 patients 24 patients were receiving adalimumab, 20 baric-itinib, 2 flgotinib, 2 upadacitinib and 3 on entarcept. Diagnoses ranged from 33 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 7 psoriatic arthritis, 5 ankylosing spondylitis, 5 spondyloarthropathy and 1 enteropathic arthritis. Disease activity scores were documented in the majority of patients (75%). In those where disease activity scores were not documented, 11 had rheumatoid arthritis and the remaining 2 psoriatic arthritis. The majority of the patients who didn't have disease activity scores documented were reviewed via telephone consult (84%). All patients had undergone adequate blood monitoring with 100% compliance with blood tests performed within 6 months. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented an extraordinary necessity for change in how we manage patients suffering from rheumatic disease. The impact of this global pandemic will be long-lasting and thorough analysis of patient outcomes is needed. However, this period presents an exciting opportunity to embrace new ways of working, which may improve efficiency and efficacy of patient care.

JANUS KINASE INHIBITORS IN IMMUNOINFLAMMATORY DISEASES: 10 YEARS OF CLINICAL PRACTICE IN RHEUMATOLOGY

Despite great advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), which have led to a significant improvement in the prognosis in many patients, the central medical problems of this pathology - restoring the quality of life and reducing mortality to the population level - are far from being resolved. This served as a powerful stimulus for the study of new approaches to the pharmacotherapy of IMIDs, one of which is associated with the discovery of targets for small-molecule therapeutics that inhibit intracellular "signaling" molecules JAKs (Janus kinases). The current achievements, trends and recommendations regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of IMIDs and also in the hyper-response phase of COVID-19 are reviewed.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of neoplastic and inflammatory disorders.

The Janus kinase (JAK) family of nonreceptor protein-tyrosine kinases consists of JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2 (Tyrosine Kinase 2). Each of these proteins contains a JAK homology pseudokinase (JH2) domain that interacts with and regulates the activity of the adjacent protein kinase domain (JH1). The Janus kinase family is regulated by numerous cytokines including interferons, interleukins, and hormones such as erythropoietin and thrombopoietin. Ligand binding to cytokine receptors leads to the activation of associated Janus kinases, which then catalyze the phosphorylation of the receptors. The SH2 domain of signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) binds to the cytokine receptor phosphotyrosines thereby promoting STAT phosphorylation and activation by the Janus kinases. STAT dimers are then translocated into the nucleus where they participate in the regulation and expression of dozens of proteins. JAK1/3 signaling participates in the pathogenesis of inflammatory disorders while JAK1/2 signaling contributes to the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms as well as several malignancies including leukemias and lymphomas. An activating JAK2 V617F mutation occurs in 95% of people with polycythemia vera and about 50% of cases of myelofibrosis and essential thrombocythemia. Abrocitinib, ruxolitinib, and upadacitinib are JAK inhibitors that are FDA-approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Baricitinib is used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and covid 19. Tofacitinib and upadacitinib are JAK antagonists that are used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and ulcerative colitis. Additionally, ruxolitinib is approved for the treatment of polycythemia vera while fedratinib, pacritinib, and ruxolitinib are approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis.

Safety Profile of Upadacitinib up to 3 Years in Psoriatic Arthritis: An Integrated Analysis of Two Pivotal Phase 3 Trials.

INTRODUCTION: This integrated analysis describes the safety profile of upadacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, at 15 and 30 mg once daily for up to 3 years of exposure in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who had a prior inadequate response or intolerance to ≥ 1 non-biologic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. METHODS: Safety data were pooled and analyzed from two randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials. Both trials evaluated upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg once daily, and one trial also evaluated adalimumab 40 mg every other week. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and laboratory data were summarized for four groups: pooled placebo, pooled upadacitinib 15 mg, pooled upadacitinib 30 mg, and adalimumab. TEAEs were reported as exposure-adjusted event rates (events per 100 patient-years [E/100 PY]) up to a data cut-off of June 29, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 2257 patients received ≥ 1 dose of upadacitinib 15 mg (N = 907) or 30 mg (N = 921) for 2504.6 PY of exposure or adalimumab (N = 429) for 549.7 PY of exposure. Upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, and increased creatine phosphokinase (CPK) were the most common TEAEs with upadacitinib. Rates of malignancies, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), and deaths were similar across treatment groups. Rates of herpes zoster (HZ) and opportunistic infections (OI; excluding tuberculosis, HZ, and oral candidiasis) were higher with upadacitinib versus adalimumab. Serious infection, anemia, and CPK elevations were most frequent with upadacitinib 30 mg. Potentially clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib 15 mg and adalimumab had similar safety profiles with the exception of HZ and OIs, consistent with what was observed in rheumatoid arthritis. Rates of malignancies, MACEs, VTEs, and deaths were comparable among patients receiving upadacitinib and adalimumab. No new safety risks emerged with longer-term exposure to upadacitinib. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: SELECT-PsA 1: NCT03104400; SELECT-PsA 2: NCT03104374.

Psoriatic arthritis is a disease that causes inflammation of the skin and joints. Upadacitinib and adalimumab are medicines that can be used to treat this condition. This analysis combined safety data from two studies of adults with psoriatic arthritis who took upadacitinib, adalimumab, or placebo (no medicine) for up to 3 years. The most common side effects of treatment with upadacitinib were infection and inflammation of the nose and throat and higher amounts of a protein in the blood called creatinine phosphokinase. The total number of cancer cases, heart (cardiovascular) problems, blood clots (embolisms), and deaths were similar across treatment groups, including the placebo (no medicine) group. However, more patients who took upadacitinib than adalimumab or placebo (no medicine) had a painful rash that causes blisters known as herpes zoster (shingles) and infections usually seen in people with a weakened immune system. Most patients had normal blood test results and continued their treatment. Overall, upadacitinib was well tolerated for up to 3 years in patients with psoriatic arthritis. These results agree with what has been found in studies of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Safety data of upadacitinib use over a longer time will be reported later.